Hope Is Not An Action Plan
If ever there is a lesson in any struggle – individual or
group and regardless of where you stand in that struggle – the lesson is that
hope is not an action plan. For things to change or remain the same (to suit
the status quo), a notable level of effort is required.
Privilege Must Fall;
my inaugural article in this very column in October last year was inspired by
South Africa’s #FeesMustFall student-led movement. Exactly twelve months later
here we are again; at square one, like maybe struggles are some meteorological
condition of the year.
Only, it seems the year long orbit has given birth to an
intensified raging struggle. It’s not surprising really that today we’re in an
uglier space than we were when all this began in 2015.
The intervention made by
South Africa’s powers that be to freeze annual tuition fee increase for 2016 no
doubt brought hope that the issue of affordability and by extension
accessibility for all to education, was receiving the attention it deserved.
In fact, the welcome intervention further gave hope that
there was recognition that addressing the matter at such high political level
was long overdue. Promises were made to students that there would be further
and thorough engagement on their cause in order to avoid it sprouting with
bigger thorns in future.
Yet here we are today with at least one life lost
during the militant uprisings because it’s clear as has always been to many a
procrastinator; that hope is not an action plan – that promises cannot be
accepted the same way that a half empty glass is appreciated.
Structural Change
It’s clear there was no committed engagement on the issue
over the past year as promised, otherwise students would have been the first,
along with the minister of higher education, to know that there would be an 8%
cap on university fee increases for 2017.
Only now, after being forced to shut
down, universities, including the University of Cape Town are doing what they
should have done between October 2015 and 2016; engaging all stakeholders on
the issue.
Some people have been quick to dismiss the students as spoilt
brats with entitlement issues because according to the minister, the cap means
that up to 75% of undergraduate students will benefit and not be affected by
any hike in fees.
But the struggle was never just about fees; the students made
this clear last year already and it was acknowledged by President Zuma when he
addressed them after they’d marched to his Union Buildings.
President Zuma
announced that government would lead a process that would go “wider” than fees,
“In the long term, there is a package of issues that was raised at the meeting
that needs to be followed up. These include free education, institutional
autonomy, racism and what the students call ‘black debt’, to mention a few,”
said Zuma.
So as parents and concerned citizens, when we criticize the student
protests are we in effect saying these other day-to-day African struggles of transformation
as raised by the students are invalid? Do we want to rather heed the
ever-present call to just “move on”?
Are
we ready to organize ourselves as parents to take a collective stand either closely
beside the student s or at the opposite end at a distance? Are we ready to
question the African Union on why it prioritized issuing of an African passport
over crafting and agreeing on education concessions for African students?
(In)Convenient Truths
Bringing the African Union in this debate is one of the
reasons I deliberately refer to WE in a few instances above because it is
important to recognize the #FeesMustFall movement as a struggle that is not
peculiar to South Africa.
I know how
easy it is to dismiss such struggles as far-removed from oneself. As a student
at the University of Swaziland I would be the first to leave campus to whenever
fellow students embarked on a protest because I’d decided that what was being
demanded had very little to do with me if at all. In fact, I found the almost
yearly protests to be inconvenient and disruptive to my studies; the students
were just delaying me.
This is what some of the 2016 students and their
sympathizers have been saying; that those who are due to complete their studies
are being delayed and inconvenienced by #FeesMustFall.
It’s a valid point to
some degree but we all know how costly convenience can be in the long term.
Think of the high price you pay when buying condoms or alcohol at a Convenience
Store at an inconvenient hour of the night compared to the price you would have
paid at a supermarket or Bottle Store at a godly hour. Planning saves a lot of
pennies and pains.
I say WE because the spillover of such a social issues is
inevitable. For Swaziland in particular, we know too well the number of our
citizens who migrate in droves to study in South Africa each year.
For those who have studied or have had children studying in
South Africa, we know too the cost implications as university financial demands
for ‘foreign’ students are not only made for tuition but also for medical
insurance and these must all be presented upfront at registration.
This is a problem because with a scenario such as the
euro/lilangeni exchange rate, it means that a Wits University education becomes
more easily accessible for an Italian from Italy than for a Swazi child just three
hours away from Johannesburg or even a Soweto child.
The reverse has never been
true for Africans wanting to study in Europe. These are some of the structural
regulations that cannot be hoped away.
We all clearly need the ‘decolonized
education’ that the students demand in order to enforce the necessary
structural change at all levels as we chart our way forward at least for the
sake of Africa’s future generations.
Comments
Post a Comment